ARE YOU HEARING WHAT I’M HEARING?
Again, I’m learning. that this defense team’s strategy is to subliminally program the Senate that this President needs to be impeached. To which I have to say profoundly, thank you! Thank you for telling the jury they have to be impartial, in their judgment of the President, meaning the can’t judge on the President’s side because of his power. They must be impartial and view the evidence.
Ken Starr also mentioned that, many cases of impeachment that our country has gone through with references to crime in each and every crime. What crime is he ignoring here? Or, is he? is he subliminally telling the Senate, how guilty that this President really is?
Is it possible for the weight of this decision to be judged fairly, even though it is in an election year? But, when in hell did that ever make an impeachment of a criminal President, not fair? My assessment of what’s not fair. is the stomping of our laws and traditions to violate as many statutes and articles of the Constitution as he possibly could. What’s also not fair is the consumption of foreign campaign help in your campaign for reelection.
Mike Purpura’s speech was full of tactical and political errors, again cementing the house’s case that this President is criminal and corrupt. All I hear coming from his mouth is spin and little else. He’s always got an excuse for every accusation that the tried to cover up, but was unsuccessful in doing so. I hear the phrase, “they didn’t tell you this and this is why,…” That, I’ve learned, is code for what’s coming, is spin. Do all mike’s talk in this alternative fact way? Or, just the ones on Donald’s defense team and in his administration?
Again he explains how this president pumped up the defense he gave Zelinsky, which is true and it’s also a load of horse hockey. He did that to pump him up for the take. He was building his extortion on President Zelensky.
WHO IN HELL CAN BELIEVE ALL THIS SPIN?
THIS DEFENSE IS NOTHING MORE THAN, SPINNING OF
FALSE FACTS AND INFORMATION, ALL MEANT TO
MISDIRECT, ANGER, CONFUSE AND DISCOMBOBULATE
ALL OF THE EVIDENCE THAT’S BEEN
SUBMITTED, UP TO DATE!
WHY DO THEY OFFER NO VALID DEFENSE,
OTHER THAN THIS RUSE OF A DEFENSE?
JAY SEKULOW,
I’m appalled at how you claim, impeaching this rogue president and removing him from office is their abuse of power. That statement is boldly and criminally a defense tactic that proves the obstruction of this administration. You’re doing your best to intimidate the Senate! That is obstruction of justice!
You made me, just realize, you are basically a criminal defense lawyer defending a criminal like any good criminal defense lawyer would defend their client. Seeing that your client is the President, who is a criminal, you have to treat him exactly the same and can only offer your defense as such. That’s because your client has already confessed to his crimes publically, (just to see how much he can get away with), he does this to show his boldness and how brazen he is to bolster his image of being a ruthless boss.
Yet, your spin along with your colleagues, speeches spun what alternative fact you could to convolute the information that already been presented, to simply confuse the public, while subliminally telling the Senate that the President is guilty of both of these articles of impeachment. Can you tell me how, court, makes sense when the President refuses to appear, on behalf of himself and not impeachment? You amuse me in your attempt to confuse me.
WHILE I HEAR THE CRY OF THE TEARS
WAILING AWAY OUR BEST YEARS
THE CRY OF THE FEARS
IS DRIVING THE ARREARS!
Patrick Philbin, thank you for pointing out, subpoenas can be ignored legally. Where did you learn that? Thank you for confirming your associates, further proof of this President’s guilt of committing the crimes that he been accused of. Again, every one of your arguments could be argued by the prosecution as well as the defense. In that manner, you’re proving the prosecution’s case. Thank you!
Pam Bondi, thank you, again for confirming the prosecution’s case, by pointing out how easily this President is duped by foreign intelligence,(which happens to be propaganda), was or important to this criminal President. Like your colleagues, you too spun your defense of the President, to convince everyone of President’s preference of the Russian intelligence over our own American intelligence. Thank you for your clarification! I always knew he we guilty. but you just explained how. Thank you for reminding us, subliminally, of the President’s own nepotism. We’re all aware of how his whole family are running this Oval Office, But I’m sure that none of that presents any conflict of interest, as you so boldly put it on a case that’s been closed for years. Nice try, but NO GO! Your ignorance is clearly evident, in your defense, for which I’m personally sorry, to see, in a face that reminds me, so much, of a past wife. Again, you spin, something that this illicit President can make a slim case of, yet it’s something that’s already been settled over 5 years ago. Why are you using Fox News for your evidence? Don’t you know that is Russian Propaganda that always plays on Fox? Whether the News channels, the sports channels, of their broadcasting channels that they run through Sinclair Media. Why do you use that source known to be from Russia, as evidence for your defense? Are you trying to convict your boss? You surely don’t think that they dispel true factual news, do you? How can you claim to be an attorney and still believe Fox News? I see in your eyes, SLUT! Sorry, I guess it’s the one, I had to live with after my head injury, which she was responsible for. Due to those emotions, you’ve earned my contempt.
Eric Herschmann, thank you for confirming that you, too, are a criminal defense attorney defend to President for his impeachment, which I’d like to remind you, is not a criminal trial. Why are you making it out to be so? To subliminally tell the Senate how guilty the President is? Thank you! Nice spin, but I’d rather ride a carousel of I want to go around. Your arguments do nothing but bo in circles to old news that’s been drummed up by our adversary to use against our union by creating division. Like I said, nice try but, no way Jose, will your words hold any weight. We know the difference between fact, and alternative facts, spin, and evidence. We know, when we see stone-cold evidence of corruption, and all you offer is spin of already settled facts. Just like your colleagues, you’re using criminal defense tactics as the others do it, showing him abusing his power because he thinks his predecessor did and he believed Putin over his own intelligence, so he had the right to commit the corruption. Thank you, for confirming that. And thank you for confirming exactly why the President needs to be removed from Office. Your claim that no one hurt is false. I was! I lost half of my income due to the actions of this asset of Russia. If you truly don’t think our national security is at risk, are you ready to eat beef stroganoff for the rest of your life? That’s what Putin wants to feed you! With all due respect (which I’m trying like hell to muster), your spin is clearly meant to protect a criminal. Unfortunately, you’re not doing a very good job of it. Like your colleagues, you’re doing more to prove the case against him than to defend him.
Robert Ray, Again I have to thank you for your reminder of the crimes committed by this President and subliminally reminding the Senate about how justice should be remanded. I for one am grateful for your effort to save our Union, I’m sure your spin was inserted in your speech for the President’s sake, for which I can forgive you, as you’ve reminded the Senate. As for the rest of your spiel, I’m dizzy from your excessive spinning of the alternative facts while touching nowhere, on the truth. Your words, also, aren’t worth the spit you had to swallow to say them. did you take that extra-credit course, How to con a con artist 101? Is that how you got your job on the President’s defense team? Again, with what due respect, I can muster, your flavor of spin, has me reeling in my tears, to try to feel anymore my own fears, about saving our Union from it apparent demise, at the hands of a Russian bought President, with the help of a Russian owned Senate
Thank you, Jay. You opened my eyes to how he’s applying his corruption. I’ll forever be grateful. I’m still hearing chatter coming from my TV while I’m listening to this trial. It’s Alan Dershowitz sharing his “infinite” wisdom. Did Harvard teach you how to defend treason? What is the punishment for treason, if you’re the professor? How can you ignore this treason, only by getting paid to do so? I try to understand, but I just can’t, which invalidates any arguments you throw out with your wild pitches. I now hold you in contempt for aiding and abetting this corruption, if this president were to ever go free and commit more of his illicit crimes. You then will be as guilty as he, for doing whatever you can in your power to destroy our Union. Thank you, Alan, for your, completely, irrelevant comments of spin. I give you a spin factor of 10 with 5 stars!!! well done! You just confused more people about the law and what it truly stands for, for obviously, your views are completely skewed. Was it done by your glyphosated diet of news? Do you get that from your friendly Russian ruse Fox News station? Hmm…you’re dead right, no one is above the law. Why don’t you know that? Don’t you practice what you preach and teach? Your words, as well as those of your colleagues, fall on the deafened ears of patriotism. You’ve deafened them with your continuous lies and deceptive flavor of corruption. How much is Putin paying you?.
IT PRECISELY THIS FLAT TIRE THAT IRKS MY VERY IRE,
I WISHED LIKE HELL, THAT THEY’D ALL JUST RETIRE TO NEVER REFIRE!
COULD THAT BRING ME TO FORGIVE A STONE-COLD LIAR?
NOT UNLESS YOU’RE DEPENDING ON YOUR LYRE FOR YOUR PYRE!
TO WHICH I RETIRE!
UNDERLYING FACT 1. YOU ARE OWNED BY RUSSIA’S
INFLUENCE OVER YOUR PARTY THROUGH FOX NEWS AND THE NRA!
FACT 2, YOUR CRIME BOSS PRESIDENT HAS COMMITTED MORE CRIMES
AGAINST THIS COUNTRY THAN THE LAST 44 PRESIDENTS COMBINED!
FACT 3, YOUR PRESIDENT DEFINED THE REASON TO IMPEACH A PRESIDENT!
(HE’S THE REASON ABORTION IS STILL LEGAL,
HIS MOTHER JUST MISSED THE BOAT, ON HIM.)
IS SHOWS EVERY REASON WHY HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABORTED!
I guess we’re destined to follow idiots whenever they show up to entertain us, then, rob us. It’s our nature to help our fellow human being, but when that human being is someone of the nature of a 4-grade bully who’s never grown up, I have a tendency to cringe at the thought of an imbecile having any kind of control of my life. That always prompts me to wonder, why don’t others think as I do?. What makes some people cling to the fantasy of following the leader, regardless of what the leader does or where the leader goes.